So, you’re thinking about becoming an airline pilot. Great!
But right away, you’ll be faced with a big question:
Should you go the MPL route or the traditional CPL route?
Both are legitimate paths to the flight deck, but they’re built quite differently. In this post, we’ll break down the key differences, similarities, and pros & cons of the Multi-Crew Pilot Licence (MPL) versus the Commercial Pilot Licence (CPL)—and explain where the Airline Transport Pilot Licence (ATPL) fits in at the end of the road.
What Is a CPL?
The Commercial Pilot Licence (CPL) is the more traditional route to becoming a professional pilot. Under this path, you typically:
- Train on single-pilot aircraft
- Log a minimum of 200 hours of total flight time (in Singapore).
- Earn various ratings (instrument, multi-engine, etc.).
This pathway offers flexibility—you’re trained to fly both solo and as part of a crew. It’s the standard licence issued to most pilot trainees outside of airline-sponsored cadet programmes.
With this licence, you can fly PIC for non-airline commercial operations I.E. Flight Instructing, Charter flights etc.
What Is an MPL?
The MPL Route: Singapore Airlines & Scoot Cadetships
Both Singapore Airlines and Scoot offer cadet programmes that lead to the Multi-Crew Pilot Licence (MPL).
Here’s what that looks like:
- You apply as a cadet directly with the airline. If successful, the airline sponsors your training
- You complete about 85–90 hours of actual flying, gaining a PPL with Instrument Rating and more than 240 hours in simulators, tailored specifically to airline operations and SOPs.
- You graduate with an MPL restricted to that airline—you can’t use it to fly commercially for another operator.
Once you join the airline officially, you begin as a Second Officer on the specific fleet you’re trained on.
Comparison between MPL vs CPL
| MPL | CPL | |
| Flight Hours | ~90 actual flight hours + ~ 240+ sim hours | 200+ total flight hours |
| Solo Flying | No commercial solo privileges | Can fly solo commercially (non-airline) |
| Training Style | Airline-specific, multi-crew from day 1 | Traditional, solo-first then multi-crew |
| Flexibility | Locked to sponsoring airline | Can apply to multiple airlines |
| Licence Validity | Only valid with airline that sponsored it | Valid across any commercial operator |
| Time to Airline | Shorter, ~18–22 months | Depending on job market |
MPL
Advantages
- Faster route into the right seat of a jet.
- Trains you for Multi Crew operations from the start
- Less flying cost since many hours are in sim.
Disadvantages
- Tied to the airline that sponsors your training—if the airline withdraws its offer, your licence is practically useless elsewhere.
- No commercial PIC privileges until you convert to a ATPL later
- Less real-world flight experience than a CPL holder.
CPL
Advantages
- Greater flexibility—you can apply to multiple airlines or fly in various sectors (charter, surveying, instruction).
- More flying experience—often more varied and hands-on.
Disadvantages
- Longer time to airline job unless you’re selected by an airline post-training.
- Higher overall cost if self-funded.
- More personal responsibility for managing ratings and exams.
What About ATPL?
The Airline Transport Pilot Licence (ATPL) is the highest licence you can hold. It allows you to act as a Captain on multi-crew aircraft.
In Singapore, CPL and MPL holders typically operate under an ATPL (frozen)—which means they’ve passed the 14 theoretical exams, but haven’t yet met the 1500 hours flying experience required to “unfreeze” it.
Final Thoughts
If you’re accepted into an MPL cadetship with a major airline, it’s a highly efficient and job-secure route—as long as the airline stays committed.
If you’re funding your own training, or want more flexibility in your career path, the CPL route makes more sense, though it may take longer to land your first airline job.
Each path has its trade-offs. What matters most is choosing the one that aligns with your goals, finances, and appetite for risk.



